<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avoiding a nuclear catastrophe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dylanratigan.com/2011/03/18/avoiding-a-nuclear-catastrophe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dylanratigan.com/2011/03/18/avoiding-a-nuclear-catastrophe/</link>
	<description>Free Yourself</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:10:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rad Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.dylanratigan.com/2011/03/18/avoiding-a-nuclear-catastrophe/#comment-29341</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rad Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dylanratigan.com/?p=3507#comment-29341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Dylan : 
 
 
To save you a little time : 
 
The quoted section, (below) is is from the bottom of page 22 of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission&#039;s Technical Training Center Manual on Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR&#039;s).  Byron Units 1 and 2 are PWR systems. 
 
You can download a copy of the entire manual at the following URL :  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/teachers/04.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/teachers/...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
======================================= 
 
Even after the reactor has been shutdown, there is a  
significant amount of heat produced by the decay of  
fission products (decay heat). The amount of heat  
produced by decay heat is sufficient to cause fuel  
damage if not removed. Therefore, systems must be  
designed and installed in the plant to remove the  
decay from the core and transfer that heat to the  
environment, even in a shutdown plant condition.  
 
Also, if it is desired to perform maintenance on reactor  
coolant system components, the temperature and  
pressure of the reactor coolant system must be  
reduced low enough to allow personnel access to the  
equipment. 
 
The auxiliary feedwater system and the steam dump 
system (turbine bypass valves) work together to allow  
the operators to remove the decay heat from the  
reactor. The auxiliary feedwater system pumps water  
from the condensate storage tank to the steam  
generators. This water is allowed to boil to make  
steam. The steam can then be dumped to the main  
condenser through the steam dump valves. The  
circulating water will then condense the steam and  
take the heat to the environment. 
 
If the steam dump system is not available (for  
example, no circulating water for the main condenser),  
the steam can be dumped directly to the atmosphere  
through the atmospheric relief valves. 
 
By using either method of steam removal, the heat is  
being removed from the reactor coolant system, and  
the temperature of the reactor coolant system can be  
reduced to the desired level. 
 
USNRC Technical Training Center  4-22  0603 
 
======================================= 
 
The release of steam directly to the environment  
indicates that at best, the steam dump system is not  
available.  At worst, they have lost substantial cooling  
capacity and are having trouble controlling the reactor. 
 
If you check the news, you&#039;ll see very little being 
reported other than everything is fine.  What you  
won&#039;t see, is reporters asking why steam is being 
released when this is not the normal process 
implemented for emergency shutdown of the plant. 
 
Obviously, they have access to the NRC manuals. 
 
They were still blowing steam late last night. 
What they are doing now, remains a mystery. 
 
 
Best Wishes, 
 
The Rad Rider ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dylan : </p>
<p>To save you a little time : </p>
<p>The quoted section, (below) is is from the bottom of page 22 of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission&#039;s Technical Training Center Manual on Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR&#039;s).  Byron Units 1 and 2 are PWR systems. </p>
<p>You can download a copy of the entire manual at the following URL :  <a href="http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/teachers/04.pdf" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/teachers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/teachers/</a>&#8230; </p>
<p>======================================= </p>
<p>Even after the reactor has been shutdown, there is a<br />
significant amount of heat produced by the decay of<br />
fission products (decay heat). The amount of heat<br />
produced by decay heat is sufficient to cause fuel<br />
damage if not removed. Therefore, systems must be<br />
designed and installed in the plant to remove the<br />
decay from the core and transfer that heat to the<br />
environment, even in a shutdown plant condition.  </p>
<p>Also, if it is desired to perform maintenance on reactor<br />
coolant system components, the temperature and<br />
pressure of the reactor coolant system must be<br />
reduced low enough to allow personnel access to the<br />
equipment. </p>
<p>The auxiliary feedwater system and the steam dump<br />
system (turbine bypass valves) work together to allow<br />
the operators to remove the decay heat from the<br />
reactor. The auxiliary feedwater system pumps water<br />
from the condensate storage tank to the steam<br />
generators. This water is allowed to boil to make<br />
steam. The steam can then be dumped to the main<br />
condenser through the steam dump valves. The<br />
circulating water will then condense the steam and<br />
take the heat to the environment. </p>
<p>If the steam dump system is not available (for<br />
example, no circulating water for the main condenser),<br />
the steam can be dumped directly to the atmosphere<br />
through the atmospheric relief valves. </p>
<p>By using either method of steam removal, the heat is<br />
being removed from the reactor coolant system, and<br />
the temperature of the reactor coolant system can be<br />
reduced to the desired level. </p>
<p>USNRC Technical Training Center  4-22  0603 </p>
<p>======================================= </p>
<p>The release of steam directly to the environment<br />
indicates that at best, the steam dump system is not<br />
available.  At worst, they have lost substantial cooling<br />
capacity and are having trouble controlling the reactor. </p>
<p>If you check the news, you&#039;ll see very little being<br />
reported other than everything is fine.  What you<br />
won&#039;t see, is reporters asking why steam is being<br />
released when this is not the normal process<br />
implemented for emergency shutdown of the plant. </p>
<p>Obviously, they have access to the NRC manuals. </p>
<p>They were still blowing steam late last night.<br />
What they are doing now, remains a mystery. </p>
<p>Best Wishes, </p>
<p>The Rad Rider </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rad Rider Too</title>
		<link>http://www.dylanratigan.com/2011/03/18/avoiding-a-nuclear-catastrophe/#comment-2805</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rad Rider Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 14:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dylanratigan.com/?p=3507#comment-2805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one likes an alarmist without cause, however, in this case, there is cause for alarm. 
 
Study the close up views of the #3 reactor explosion and you will see that the blast was 
not the type of blast one would expect from a hydrogen explosion.  The fireball seen in the 
corner of the plant was too small.  Not only that, inspection reveals that this was a directional  
blast.  Much as if a cannon had been fired straight up from inside the reactor building.  This is  
what one would expect if the reactor dome exploded with enough force to take out the concrete  
pads covering the reactor dome. 
 
Injecting sea water into the molten core causes an immediate explosion of steam.  If the temperature 
of the reactor vessel had reached critical temperature, it would not have had the integrity required to 
withstand this dramatic increase in pressure. 
  
If my assessment is correct, the dark colored cloud we witnessed contained the MOX core of 
the reactor and made this accident, worse than the one at Chernobyl.   
 
I also suspect that the #1 and #2 reactor vessels have lost integrity due to the same process. 
 
P.S. - I wish to contact me, try the e-mail address submitted with this post.   
My Yahoo account seems to have been deleted. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one likes an alarmist without cause, however, in this case, there is cause for alarm. </p>
<p>Study the close up views of the #3 reactor explosion and you will see that the blast was<br />
not the type of blast one would expect from a hydrogen explosion.  The fireball seen in the<br />
corner of the plant was too small.  Not only that, inspection reveals that this was a directional<br />
blast.  Much as if a cannon had been fired straight up from inside the reactor building.  This is<br />
what one would expect if the reactor dome exploded with enough force to take out the concrete<br />
pads covering the reactor dome. </p>
<p>Injecting sea water into the molten core causes an immediate explosion of steam.  If the temperature<br />
of the reactor vessel had reached critical temperature, it would not have had the integrity required to<br />
withstand this dramatic increase in pressure. </p>
<p>If my assessment is correct, the dark colored cloud we witnessed contained the MOX core of<br />
the reactor and made this accident, worse than the one at Chernobyl.   </p>
<p>I also suspect that the #1 and #2 reactor vessels have lost integrity due to the same process. </p>
<p>P.S. &#8211; I wish to contact me, try the e-mail address submitted with this post.<br />
My Yahoo account seems to have been deleted. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rad Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.dylanratigan.com/2011/03/18/avoiding-a-nuclear-catastrophe/#comment-2733</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rad Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dylanratigan.com/?p=3507#comment-2733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please find out where the waste water from the reactor drenching is being stored. I strongly suspect that proper holding vessels are not being employed and that contaminated waste water is returning to the ocean. 
 
Given the tremendous volume of radioactive run off created during the past several days, this is a problem that needs to be addressed most urgently. 
 
If the electric company needs to hire ocean going tankers with specialized pumping equipment, this service should be available. The delay is allowing this to become an even larger disaster. Not only for Japan but perhaps for us all. 
 
Someone must take command that understands the consequences of failing to properly contain the waste water being generated at Fukushima. 
 
The solution is actually rather simple and the solution is not dilution. By dumping a few loads of sand into the manhole(s) closest to the ocean, the storm sewer system becomes a holding cell. The manholes closer to the plant could then be used as points from which the radioactive waste water could 
be pumped back onto the reactor buildings or to a tanker. 
 
PLEASE HURRY 
 
P.S. - I love your show but the time slot sucks.  Then again, so does the MSNBC weekend programming. 
Hopefully you get a better time slot soon.  I sent the above letter to Sen. Barbara Boxer and the Senate committee on the environment.  No word back but I am a small voice among the masses. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please find out where the waste water from the reactor drenching is being stored. I strongly suspect that proper holding vessels are not being employed and that contaminated waste water is returning to the ocean. </p>
<p>Given the tremendous volume of radioactive run off created during the past several days, this is a problem that needs to be addressed most urgently. </p>
<p>If the electric company needs to hire ocean going tankers with specialized pumping equipment, this service should be available. The delay is allowing this to become an even larger disaster. Not only for Japan but perhaps for us all. </p>
<p>Someone must take command that understands the consequences of failing to properly contain the waste water being generated at Fukushima. </p>
<p>The solution is actually rather simple and the solution is not dilution. By dumping a few loads of sand into the manhole(s) closest to the ocean, the storm sewer system becomes a holding cell. The manholes closer to the plant could then be used as points from which the radioactive waste water could<br />
be pumped back onto the reactor buildings or to a tanker. </p>
<p>PLEASE HURRY </p>
<p>P.S. &#8211; I love your show but the time slot sucks.  Then again, so does the MSNBC weekend programming.<br />
Hopefully you get a better time slot soon.  I sent the above letter to Sen. Barbara Boxer and the Senate committee on the environment.  No word back but I am a small voice among the masses. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
